When it comes to mergers and acquisitions (M&A), the structure of financing can be as complex as the deal itself. One of the most critical elements of deal financing-especially when multiple lenders are involved-is the intercreditor agreement. This legal instrument governs the rights and priorities of different classes of creditors and plays a vital role in determining how conflicts are resolved, who gets paid first in a default, and how collateral is shared. Understanding how intercreditor agreements operate can make or break the financial foundation of a successful acquisition.
Contact us by either using the online form or calling us directly at 414-253-8500 for legal assistance.
What Is an Intercreditor Agreement?
An intercreditor agreement (ICA) is a contract between two or more creditors who have extended credit to a common borrower. Its primary purpose is to establish each lender's rights and remedies in the event of a borrower's default or bankruptcy. In the context of M&A financing, these agreements become essential when:
-
There are multiple tranches of debt (e.g., senior secured loans and subordinated mezzanine loans),
-
Lenders are sharing collateral, or
-
The borrower has layered its capital structure with different classes of investors.
A properly structured ICA can protect the lead lender's position while allowing junior creditors to lend with a clear understanding of their place in the repayment hierarchy.
Why Intercreditor Agreements Are Crucial in M&A Transactions
In the high-stakes world of acquisitions, clarity around debt repayment is non-negotiable. Intercreditor agreements help:
-
Mitigate risk by defining who gets paid first and under what conditions.
-
Avoid litigation between competing creditors.
-
Enable complex capital stacks, including senior, subordinated, and mezzanine financing.
-
Streamline enforcement of remedies in default scenarios.
For acquirers, a strong ICA can provide financing flexibility while giving all parties-borrowers and lenders-confidence in how capital will be managed.
Key Components of an Intercreditor Agreement
While no two ICAs are identical, most will address the following elements:
1. Ranking and Priority of Debt
The agreement specifies the payment hierarchy, often distinguishing between:
-
Senior debt: usually secured and paid first.
-
Subordinated or mezzanine debt: unsecured or second-lien, paid after senior lenders are satisfied.
2. Lien Subordination
In deals involving shared collateral, the ICA defines which creditor holds the first lien versus second lien rights. It also determines what each creditor can do with the collateral if the borrower defaults.
3. Standstill Provisions
These clauses prevent junior lenders from exercising enforcement rights (like foreclosure) for a defined period, giving senior lenders a head start to recover their claims.
4. Payment Blockage
The ICA may allow senior lenders to block payments to junior creditors during certain trigger events, such as default, preserving cash flow to pay off higher-ranking debt.
5. Remedy Standstill & Waivers
Junior creditors may agree to waive or limit their rights to act unilaterally in a workout or bankruptcy situation, ensuring coordinated action among lenders.
6. Bankruptcy Rights
The agreement may restrict junior creditors' ability to object to senior creditors' actions in bankruptcy proceedings, such as debtor-in-possession financing or asset sales under §363.
Common Structures of Intercreditor Relationships
In M&A financing, the most common intercreditor structures include:
First Lien / Second Lien
Two sets of secured lenders, each with a lien on the same collateral, but one is first in time and right.
-
Example: A private equity-backed acquisition funded by a bank (first lien) and a private credit fund (second lien).
Senior / Subordinated (Mezzanine)
Senior lenders have a perfected security interest; subordinated lenders typically do not or have secondary liens.
-
Example: A mezzanine investor providing unsecured debt in exchange for higher interest and equity kickers.
Unitranche A/B Structures
In a unitranche structure, multiple lenders fund a single loan agreement, but an internal agreement among lenders (AAL) functions like an ICA to govern priorities.
Potential Pitfalls and Legal Challenges
Intercreditor agreements, while protective, can also be fraught with complexity. Parties often face disputes or challenges related to:
-
Ambiguity in priority provisions
-
Conflicts in enforcement strategies
-
Bankruptcy objections by junior creditors
-
Unexpected defaults or restructuring negotiations
To avoid these pitfalls, careful drafting and legal review of the ICA is essential. At Heritage Law Office, we help clients structure these agreements in a way that anticipates problems and mitigates risk.
Negotiating Intercreditor Agreements: What Borrowers and Lenders Should Know
Successful negotiation of an intercreditor agreement requires deep legal and commercial insight. Each party-senior lender, junior lender, and borrower-has different interests. Negotiation points often include:
1. Scope of Collateral
Senior creditors typically want blanket liens, while junior creditors may seek excluded asset carve-outs. The ICA must balance risk exposure with lender confidence.
2. Cure Rights
Junior lenders sometimes negotiate the right to cure defaults under the senior debt to protect their investment. This provision must be clearly defined to avoid confusion.
3. Sale Proceeds Distribution
In asset sales or foreclosure scenarios, the ICA outlines how sale proceeds are applied across tranches. Getting this wrong can lead to disputes and litigation.
4. Consent Rights
Junior creditors may seek limited veto power over amendments to senior debt documents that could impair their interests-such as increasing senior debt or extending maturity.
5. Information Sharing
Junior lenders often request access to financial updates and notices of default-a critical piece for monitoring risk.
How Intercreditor Agreements Impact M&A Strategy
Whether you're a buyer, seller, or lender, ICAs can significantly impact deal dynamics, including:
-
Deal timeline: Negotiating the ICA can delay closing if not addressed early.
-
Financing options: Without an ICA, junior lenders may refuse to participate.
-
Valuation and purchase price: If subordinated financing is harder to secure, the buyer's purchasing power may decrease.
-
Post-closing flexibility: Onerous ICAs can limit future capital raising or refinancing options.
Smart acquirers plan for this during the term sheet stage and loop in legal counsel early to review lender proposals.
Intercreditor Agreements in Distressed M&A Deals
In distressed acquisitions, the ICA becomes even more important. These deals often include:
-
Debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing
-
Bankruptcy sales under 11 U.S.C. §363
-
Forbearance or restructuring agreements
A well-drafted intercreditor agreement can enable fast asset purchases, especially if the senior lender can control the collateral without junior lender interference. Conversely, a poorly structured ICA can delay or derail a deal if junior creditors seek injunctions or claim violations.
Best Practices for Drafting and Reviewing Intercreditor Agreements
To avoid costly litigation and financing roadblocks, consider these best practices:
-
Engage experienced M&A financing counsel early in the process.
-
Use clear, unambiguous language in priority, payment, and enforcement clauses.
-
Model out repayment scenarios to confirm the ICA operates as intended.
-
Coordinate lender expectations with a shared understanding of risk and remedies.
-
Ensure consistency between the ICA and related documents like loan agreements and security instruments.
Contact an Attorney for Intercreditor Agreements in M&A Financing
If you're acquiring a business, funding a deal, or serving as a lender in a multi-tiered capital structure, a well-structured intercreditor agreement is essential. At Heritage Law Office, we assist clients with drafting, negotiating, and reviewing ICAs that support successful M&A outcomes while minimizing legal risk.
Contact us today to protect your financial interests and get legal clarity in your next transaction. Reach out via our contact form or call us directly at 414-253-8500.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What is the purpose of an intercreditor agreement?
An intercreditor agreement establishes the rights, responsibilities, and priorities of multiple lenders who have extended credit to the same borrower. It clarifies how repayments are distributed, how collateral is handled, and what actions each creditor can take in case of a default or bankruptcy, reducing conflicts and legal disputes among lenders.
2. How does an intercreditor agreement affect a borrower's financing options?
Intercreditor agreements can expand a borrower's financing options by enabling layered debt structures, such as senior and mezzanine financing. By clearly defining lender rights, ICAs provide comfort to junior creditors, making them more willing to extend credit without undermining the position of senior lenders.
3. Can an intercreditor agreement be modified after it is signed?
Yes, but modifications usually require consent from all parties involved-typically the senior and junior creditors, and sometimes the borrower. Amendments to an ICA are carefully scrutinized, especially if they impact lien priorities, enforcement rights, or payment provisions.
4. What happens if there is no intercreditor agreement in a multi-lender M&A deal?
Without an ICA, disputes are likely to arise between lenders during a default or bankruptcy situation. There may be uncertainty about lien priority, payment rights, or enforcement actions. This can lead to costly litigation and delays, making the transaction riskier for all involved parties.
5. How does an intercreditor agreement influence bankruptcy proceedings?
In bankruptcy, the ICA often governs which creditor can act, vote, or object in court. It may restrict junior lenders from contesting senior creditor actions, such as debtor-in-possession financing or asset sales. This coordination ensures a smoother and more predictable bankruptcy process.